imam ali asws was aware of his martyrdom

i was reading a book named “khanwada-e-nabi: yani hazrat ali, hasnain aur hazrat fatima asws ke fadail wa manqib”
it is basically a translation of “manaqib ali wa alhasanain wa umhoma fatima zahra” by doctor abdul mo’ti amin qal’aji
translate of the book i dr mohammod ul hasan arif
it is the 2nd edition, published in year 1424 by matb’a adam islami, pakistan

on the main page, we see that it is written that

“a good collection of authentic narration”

and in this, we see a chapter named

“his awareness of his killing (martyrdom)”

he narrated 7 narrations in this, let me quote a few

cursing abu hanifa

let us pay attention to another book, it is kitab us sunnah by abdullah bin ahmad bin hanbal
and it takhreej has been done by mohammad bin saeed bin salim al qahtani

in kitab us sunnah, abdullah bin ahmad bin hanbal, vol 1, page 211; we find

345- khazai said that i heard hamad bin salma cursing abu hanifa;; and abu salma said that sho’ba cursed abu hanifa

researcher of the book says

“SANAD/ CHAIN IS SAHIH”

two imams of ahlusunnah, hamad bin salma and shoba bin hajaj cursed abu hanifa
and chain is sahih

what is this CURSING called by ahlusunnah?????

imam abu hanifa; the one who destroyed pillars of islam

let us pay attention to another book, it is kitab us sunnah by abdullah bin ahmad bin hanbal
and it takhreej has been done by mohammad bin saeed bin salim al qahtani

in kitab us sunnah, abdullah bin ahmad bin hanbal, vol 1, page 207; we find

324- auzai said when he heard about death of abu hanifa “thanks to god, he destroyed pillars of islam one by one”

researcher of the books says

“sanad/chain is hasan/good”

abu hanifa: a man who mocked religion

let us pay attention to another book, it is kitab us sunnah by abdullah bin ahmad bin hanbal
and it takhreej has been done by mohammad bin saeed bin salim al qahtani

in kitab us sunnah, abdullah bin ahmad bin hanbal, vol 1, page 119, we find

292- imam malik discussed abu hanifa in bad words, and then he said: he mocked at religion, and who mocks at religion, he has no religion

researcher of the book says:-

all narrators are thiqa

then we find

293- imam malik said about abu hanifa that his words took him out of religion; and he said: abu hanifa did not mock but relgion

researcher of the book says:-

all narrators are thiqa

abu hanifa: a murtad?

let us pay attention to another book, it is kitab us sunnah by abdullah bin ahmad bin hanbal
and it takhreej has been done by mohammad bin saeed bin salim al qahtani
in kitab us sunnah, abdullah bin ahmad bin hanbal, vol 1, page 193, we find that

268 – حدثني عبد الله بن معاذ العنبري قال سمعت أبي يقول سمعت سفيان الثوري يقول استتيب أبو حنيفة من الكفر مرتين

Sufian thori said: ‘Abu Hanifa repented from Kufr twice’

researcher of the books says about the sanad:-

“all narrators are trustworthy/thiqa”

another sanad is mentioned in hadeeth 270 on the same page as well

269 – حدثني أبو الفضل الخراساني نا سلمة بن شبيب نا الفريابي سمعت سفيان الثوري يقول استتيب أبو حنيفة من كلام الزنادقة مرارا

Sufian thori said:’ Abu Hanfia repented from heretics opinions many times’

researcher of the books says about the sanad:-

“all narrators are trustworthy/thiqa”

 

in kitab us sunnah, abdullah bin ahmad bin hanbal, vol 1, page 204, we find a narration already discussed with another sanad

311- Sufian thori said: ‘Abu Hanifa repented from Kufr twice’

researcher of the book says:-

all narrators are thiqa

abu hanifa: the most evil character in islam

let us pay attention to another book, it is kitab us sunnah by abdullah bin ahmad bin hanbal
and it takhreej has been done by mohammad bin saeed bin salim al qahtani

in kitab us sunnah, vol 1, page 187, narration 248, we find that auzai had said that

abu hanifa is the most evil (along with abu muslim) being born in islam

we have talked of it before as well
however, here we see that sanad has been termed

“all narrators are thiqa”

in kitab us sunnah, abdullah bin ahmad bin hanbal, vol 1, page 204, we find a narration already discussed with another sanad

311- Sufian thori said: ‘Abu Hanifa repented from Kufr twice’

researcher of the book says:-

all narrators are thiqa

then we find

312- auzai said that none has born in islam more unfortunate than abu hanifa

researcher of the book says:

all narratos are thiqa

bukhari did not take narrations from a sahabi because he was a shia

this is english translation for this post

ibn asaakr and khateeb baghdaadi write

كتب إلي أبو نصر بن القشيري أنا أبو بكر البيهقي أنا أبو عبد الله الحافظ قال سمعت أبا عبد الله يعني محمد بن يعقوب الأخرم يقول:

وَسُئِلَ: لِمَ تَرَكَ الْبُخَارِيُّ حَدِيثَ أَبِي الطُّفَيْلِ عَامِرِ بْنِ وَاثِلَةَ، قَالَ: ” لأَنَّهُ كَانَ يُفْرِطُ فِي التَّشَيُّعِ “

ابن عساكر الدمشقي الشافعي، أبي القاسم علي بن الحسن إبن هبة الله بن عبد الله (متوفاى571هـ)، تاريخ مدينة دمشق وذكر فضلها وتسمية من حلها من الأماثل، ج 26 ص 128، تحقيق: محب الدين أبي سعيد عمر بن غرامة العمري، ناشر: دار الفكر – بيروت – 1995.

البغدادي، ابوبكر أحمد بن علي بن ثابت الخطيب (متوفاى463هـ)، الكفاية في علم الرواية، ج 1 ص 131، تحقيق: ابوعبدالله السورقي، إبراهيم حمدي المدني، ناشر:المكتبة العلمية – المدينة المنورة.

mohammad bin yaqoob said: he was asked: why did bukhari left narrations of abu tufail aamir bin wathila?
he replied: he had increased in tashayyu/shi’ism

[tareekh madina damishq/ ibn assakr/ vol 26/ page 128]

abu hanifa and haq/truth are separate

we read the following in Tarikh Baghdad, Volume 15 page 561:

أخبرنا العتيقي حدثنا يوسف بن احمد الصيدلاني حدثنا محمد بن عمرو العقيلي حدثني زكريا بن يحيى الحلواني قال سمعت محمد بن بشار العبدي بندارا يقول قلما كان عبد الرحمن بن مهدي يذكر أبا حنيفة علي إلا قال كان بينه وبين الحق حجاب

Abdulrahman bin Mahdi said: ‘There was a wall between Abu Hanifa and the truth’

see scan here

 

 

who acts on fatwas of abu hanifa…….

we read the following in Tarikh Baghdad, Volume 15 page 556:

حدثني الأزهري أخبرنا محمد بن العباس قال حدثنا عبد الله بن إسحاق المدائني حدثنا احمد بن موسى الحزامي حدثنا هدبة وهو بن عبد الوهاب حدثنا أبو إسحاق الطالقاني قال سمعت عبد الله بن المبارك يقول من كان عنده كتاب حيل أبي حنيفة يستعمله أو يفتي به فقد بطل حجه وبانت منه امرأته فقال مولى بن المبارك يا أبا عبد الرحمن ما أدري وضع كتاب الحيل إلا شيطان فقال بن المبارك الذي وضع كتاب الحيل أشر من الشيطان

Abu Ishaq al-Taleqani said: ‘I heard Abdullah bin al-Mubarak saying: ‘Anyone that owns the book of Abu Hanifa and uses it and spreads the opinions with it, will cause his Hajj to become void and his wife shall no longer remain lawful for him’ Then the slave of Ibn al-Mubarak said: ‘I think the one who wrote the book is Satan’. Ibn al-Mubarak replied: ‘The one who wrote the book is worse than Satan’.

researcher of the book, bashar awad maroof termed narration authentic/sahih

see scan here

abu hanifa: the most unfortunate and most evil character in islam

we find in tareekh baghdaad, vol 15, page 549

“au’zai and sufian said that ‘No one was born in Islam more unfortunate : and shafai said more evil than : on the Muslims other than him”

bashar awad maroof, researcher of the book, said: isnaad sahih, narrators thiqa

also

Sufyan said: ‘No one was born in Islam more harmful than Abu Hanifa’

bashar awad maroof, researcher of the book, said: isnaad sahih

see scans here