just came across this post on a blog, here we see a nasibi quoting a narration

قال أمير المؤمنين علي رضي الله عنه :

(حَرّم رسول الله صلى الله عليه وآله يوم خيبر لحوم الحمر الأهلية ، ونكاح المتعة )

انظر التهذيب 2/186 ، الاستبصار 3/142 ، وسائل الشيعة 14/ 441

Ali RAA said: The Prophet PBUH forbade The meat of Donkeys and the Nikah of Mutah on the day of Khaybar.
Al tahtheeb 2/186, Al Istibsar 3/142, Wasael al Shia 14/441. (page & volume can vary)

Lets see each source one by one:

1st reference: Here is this hadeeth:

وَ أَمَّا مَا رَوَاهُ مُحَمَّدُ«» بْنُ أَحْمَدَ بْنُ يَحْيَى عَنْ أَبِي جَعْفَرٍ عَنْ أَبِي الْجَوْزَاءِ عَنِ الْحُسَيْنِ بْنِ عُلْوَانَ عَنْ عَمْرِو بْنِ خَالِدٍ عَنْ زَيْدِ بْنِ عَلِيٍّ عَنْ آبَائِهِ عَنْ عَلِيٍّ ع قَالَ حَرَّمَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ ص يَوْمَ خَيْبَرَ لُحُومَ الْحُمُرِ الْأَهْلِيَّةِ وَ نِكَاحَ الْمُتْعَةِ

Source: Al-Toosi, Tahdheeb Al-ahkaam, vol. 7, pg. 251

Grading: Al-Majlisi said this hadeeth is Da’eef or Muwaththaq (Weak or Reliable) in Milaadh Al-Akhyaar, vol. 12, pg. 32
But here is what Al-Toosi has said about this hadeeth:

فَإِنَّ هَذِهِ الرِّوَايَةَ وَرَدَتْ مَوْرِدَ التَّقِيَّةِ وَ عَلَى مَا يَذْهَبُ إِلَيْهِ مُخَالِفُو الشِّيعَةِ و

Basically this has hadeeth could’ve been done under taqiyyah.

This shows us that he accepted that narration as authentic.

interestingly, he is giving the impression that sheikh tusi has accepted it authentic

so, let us see what is the opinion of tusi as mentioned in al-istibsaar


5 فأما ما رواه محمد بن أحمد بن يحيى عن أبي الجوزا عن الحسين بن علوان عن عمرو بن خالد عن زيد بن علي عن آبائه عن علي (عل) قال: حرم رسول الله صلى الله عليه وآله لحوم الحمر الاهلية ونكاح المتعة.

فالوجه في هذه الرواية أن نحملها على التقية لانها موافقة لمذاهب العامة والاخبار الاولة موافقة لظاهر الكتاب وإجماع الفرقة المحقة على موجبها فيجب أن يكون العمل بها دون هذه الرواية الشاذة.

[al-istibsaar, vol 3, page 551]

and for this reason in this narration, we should understand this hadith as being upon taqiyya as it is in agreement with the madhab of aama (sunnis) whereas the hadiths before are in agreement with what comes from of the Book and Ijma` of the true sect, so one must act in accordance with them, and not this “shadh” narration.

this guy needs to realize that shadh hadeeth is a type of daif hadeeth

anyways, let us see how he does the rijal analysis

he mentions in that

 

3. Hussein bin Alwan is Trustworthy here:
وثقه أحمد عبدالرضا البصري في فائق المقال ( ص 104 ) برقم [ 321 ]

ووثقه النوري الطبرسي في خاتمة المستدرك – ج 4 – ص 314 – 316

و المفيد من معجم رجال الحديث مختصر كتاب الخوئي – محمد الجواهري – ص 173

3500 – 3499 – 3508 – الحسين بن علوان : الكلبي عامي – ثقة .

 

interestingly, he is writing that he is AAMI which means from sunni sect, but may be he is unaware of it

still, it is known that he was aami/sunni

najashi mentioned this in his rijal, page 52, narrator 116
ibn daood mentioned this in his rijal, page 445, narrator 140
hilli mentioned this in his khulasa, page 216

at the end he asks this question

But shia use other hadiths which proves that bla bla did mutah. But you can see above is the hadith which proves that shia also has reliable hadith which proves mutah was made haram. However, the only real question that remains is that are there are authentic hadiths attributed to Ali regarding the permissibility of Muta’a? If not, then wouldn’t this hadith, the one with the Zaidi narrator, be accepted as authentic?

not just zaidi
with a sunni narrator as well…………………

which you are trying to hide

Advertisements