In this particular post of ours, We would like to show you how Nasibi website tried to deceive their readers. Snap Shots from their website are given at the end of the post

They wrote on their site

14798 – Narrated Abil-Tufayl, who said [as follows]: ‘Hassan bin Alee bin Abi Taalib gave a sermon, he praised Allah (swt), and he mentioned the Commander of the faithful, Alee (r.a), the seal of the awsiyah, and the successor of the Prophets, and the [most] honest of the truthful and the martyrs.

This narration is weak as it was only narrated through Ma`rouf bin Khurboudh and Ibn Ma`een weakened him.

So, they are trying to tell us that the narrations of Ma’rouf ibn Khurboudh are Weak as he has been weakened by Ibn Moin.

But  Liars have no memory to stand upon. They forgot that they wrote in the same very article:-

In Sahih al-Bukhari 1/217 we read:

حَدَّثَنَا عُبَيْدُ اللَّهِ بْنُ مُوسَى عَنْ مَعْرُوفِ بْنِ خَرَّبُوذٍ عَنْ أَبِي الطُّفَيْلِ عَنْ عَلِيٍّ بِذَلِكَ

[`Ubaydullah bin Musa told us, from Ma`rouf bin Kharaboudh, from abi al-Tufayl, from `Ali with it…]

So, we see from their own website, that the narrations of Ma’rouf were considered Saheeh/Authentic by none other than Their Great Scholar of Hadeeth————Bukhari, who included His narration in his Saheeh.

Ma’rouf bin Khurboudh is a narrator of Saheeh Muslim (p. 662; Hadeeth 1275), and hence his Narrations Should be termed “authentic on terms set by Sheikhain” [Bukhari & Muslim]

Apart from these Past Scholars of Hadeeth, even present day Scholars of Ahlu Sunnah did not term his Narrations Weak.

Sheikh Hussein Saleem Asad termed Narration of Marouf as Saheeh Sanad/Authentic Chain in his Research on Musnad Abu Y’ala, 2/197-198, Narration 903

Sheikh Albany included his Narration in Saheeh Sunan Ibn Maja, 3/25, Narration 2404; and termed it Saheeh/authentic

Sheikh Hamza Ahmad Zain termed His Narrations as Saheeh Sanad/Authentic Chain in his research upon Musnad Imam Ahmad, 17/127, Narration 23688

Even Sheikh Shoaib al Arnawut did not term his narrations Daif/Weak, rather termed them Hasan in his Takhreej/Research upon Musnad Imam Ahmad, Narration no. 23798

However, since opinions of Bukhari,Muslim and these present day Scholars did not suit the dirty desires of these Nasibi creatures, they simply ignored their views.

abut0

abut1

I am Thankful to Brother Jibrael for his Help. May Allah bless him, give him the strength to serve Ma’soomen; and given him Happiness in both worlds. Amin

to see more deceptions of this website, please refer to these articles

https://ahlubait.wordpress.com/2013/12/17/deception-of-nasibi-website-in-narration-comparing-imam-ali-asws-to-sheikhain/

 

 

https://ahlubait.wordpress.com/2013/11/19/the-banu-umayah-were-cursed-and-hated-by-the-holy-prophet-s/

Advertisements