Nasibi website tried to respond to an article present on my Blog, and that can be read HERE

Let us see how they tried to deceive readers This time

They write

SoA translated the narration as:

When Dajjal would come out, he would be followed by lovers of Uthman, and if they had died before that, they would bring faith in dajjal in their graves.

Well, honestly speaking, This is not the Narration. It was what Faswi wrote. And I had used this one to prove what was missing in Narration. Here is the actual Narration

حدثنا ابن نمير حدثنا محمد بن الصلت حدثنا منصور بن أبي الأسود عن الأعمش عن زيد بن وهب عن حذيفة قال: من كان يحب وخرج الدجال تبعه، فأن مات قبل أن يخرج آمن به في قبره.

Hudaifa says that Who would love ____________ and Dajjal would come out, they would follow him. If they had died before his appearence, they will have faith in him/dajjal in their graves. 

[al Maarifat wa al Tareekh, 1/364. online link]

You can see that i have placed an underline to show that something is missing there

and then Faswi says a few lines ahead…….

And then I quoted His words. Since the words are missing in Original Narration Faswi mentioned, whether it was due to Mistake or intentional, I mentioned this one, which they portrayed as Narration.

They also wrote

we find in an authentic narration that Hudhaifa was not sure whether the assassination of Uthman would lead to good or evil. This very fact contradicts the statement above that has been attributed to him.

I am unable to understand what is the logic behind this statement. Who is talking about Uthman or Killing of Uthman?  Was Dajjal appearing in That era??

Narration is talking about Lovers of Uthman following Dajjal

They further tried to deceive people by saying

As for the chain, we find two flaws. The first is that it comes from the narration of Al-A’amash who is a known Mudallis, and he did not state that he heard this narration from his Shaykh.

I am very much surprised because such Narrations of al-A’amash from Zaid bin Wahab have been accepted as Authentic by Big guns of Sunni Rijal like Imam Muslim, Sheikh Shoaib al-Arnawut and Sheikh Nasir Albany. Please read the link to original article I had given above, where I had given examples. But despite that fact, This Nasibi website tried to deceive.

Let us see another attempt of deception. They write

The second flaw in the chain is that Mansour bin Abi Al-Aswad is a major shi’ee narrator according to Yahya bin Ma’een. Not only that, but he is not of a high level of tawtheeq, and the praise from scholars are mediocre praises. The least of which is the statement of Abu Hatim, “His hadith can be written.” He implies that it is only used for supporting narrations. See his biography in Tahtheeb Al-Tahtheeb.

OK, Let us see His Biography in Tehtheeb al-Tahtheeb,10/305; We find Ibn Hajar writing

قال بن أبي خيثمة عن بن معين ثقة وقال إبراهيم بن الجنيد عن بن معين لا بأس به كان من الشيعة الكبار وقال أبو حاتم يكتب حديثه وقال النسائي ليس به بأس وذكره بن حبان في الثقات

Now, Ibn Ma’een counted him as Thiqa/Trustworthy and Ibn Hibban counted him as Thiqa too………

What else they want?

Let us see What Sheikh Albany said about Him in Silsila Ahadeeth Saheehiyya, 6/1027, Narration 2925

حدثنا إسحاق بن منصور عن منصور بن أبي الأسود عن الأعمش
عن إبراهيم عن علقمة عن عبد الله قال: فذكره مرفوعا. ورواه الطبراني في
” الكبير ” (9995) من طريق آخر عن ابن أبي الأسود. قلت: وهذا إسناد صحيح
رجاله ثقات رجال الشيخين غير منصور بن أبي الأسود، وهو ثقة على تشيع فيه

We find that Mansoor is Narrating from al-A’mash, and Albany has graded the Chain Saheeh/Authentic, and imparted Trustworthiness to Mansoor too. But too Nasibis, This all is “mediocre praises

This actually tells us about their Rijal expertise apart from their expertise in Deception………

 

 

hud

 

hud2

Advertisements