You are currently browsing the tag archive for the ‘shia’ tag.

we find in surat aal-e-imran,verse 28

لَا يَتَّخِذِ الْمُؤْمِنُونَ الْكَافِرِينَ أَوْلِيَاءَ مِنْ دُونِ الْمُؤْمِنِينَ ۖ وَمَنْ يَفْعَلْ ذَٰلِكَ فَلَيْسَ مِنَ اللَّهِ فِي شَيْءٍ إِلَّا أَنْ تَتَّقُوا مِنْهُمْ تُقَاةً ۗ وَيُحَذِّرُكُمُ اللَّهُ نَفْسَهُ ۗ وَإِلَى اللَّهِ الْمَصِيرُ

[Ahmed Ali]
مسلمان مسلمانوں کو چھوڑ کر کافروں کو دوست نہ بنائيں اور جوکوئی یہ کام کریں اسے الله سے کوئی تعلق نہیں مگر اس صورت میں کہ تم ان سے بچاؤ کرنا چاہو
اور الله تمہیں اپنے سے ڈراتا ہے اور الله ہی کی طرف لوٹ کر جانا ہے

مؤمنوں کو چاہئے کہ مؤمنوں کے سوا کافروں کو دوست نہ بنائیں اور جو ایسا کرے گا اس سے خدا کا کچھ (عہد) نہیں ہاں اگر اس طریق سے تم ان (کے شر) سے بچاؤ کی صورت پیدا کرو (تو مضائقہ نہیں) اور خدا تم کو اپنے (غضب) سے ڈراتا ہے اور خدا ہی کی طرف (تم کو) لوٹ کر جانا ہے

[Yusuf Ali] Let not the Believers take for friends or helpers unbelievers rather than believers; if any do that, shall have no relation left with Allah except by way of precaution, that ye may guard yourselves from them. But Allah cautions you (to fear) Himself for the final goal is to Allah

[Mohsin Khan] Let not the believers take the disbelievers as Auliyâ (supporters, helpers) instead of the believers, and whoever does that will never be helped by Allâh in any way, except if you indeed fear a danger from them. And Allâh warns you against Himself (His Punishment), and to Allâh is the final return.

[Pickthal] Let not the believers take disbelievers for their friends in preference to believers. Whoso doeth that hath no connection with Allah unless (it be) that ye but guard yourselves against them, taking (as it were) security. Allah biddeth you beware (only) of Himself. Unto Allah is the journeying

[Shakir] Let not the believers take the unbelievers for friends rather than believers; and whoever does this, he shall have nothing of (the guardianship of) Allah, but you should guard yourselves against them, guarding carefully; and Allah makes you cautious of (retribution from) Himself; and to Allah is the eventual coming

now, if this verse is read carefully, we find that it is written that

إِلَّا أَنْ تَتَّقُوا مِنْهُمْ تُقَاةً

when we read sunni tafasir, we find that this verse was recited in regards to taqayya

let me quote the tafsir

تفسير الجامع لاحكام القرآن/ القرطبي

the online link for the page in this tafsir is

and we find it is written that

وقرأ جابر بن زيد ومجاهد والضحاك: «إلاّ أن تَتَّقُوا منهم تَقِيَّةً» وقيل: إن المؤمن إذا كان قائماً بين الكفار فله أن يداريهم باللسان إذا كان خائفاً على نفسه وقلبُه مطمئن بالإيمان. والتقِية لا تحِل إلا مع خوف القتل أو القطع أو الإيذاء العظيم

and jabir bin zaid and mujahid and dhahak recited the verse as «إلاّ أن تَتَّقُوا منهم تَقِيَّةً» and they said that when a momin is in between kuffar, and he is scared for himself, and he says with the tongue but is satisfied (with eman) in his heart. and there is no taqayya except in fear of death, or amputation or great suffering

so this tells us that this verse is regarding taqayya. let us see more from this tafsir

we find ibn abbass defining taqayya

قال ٱبن عباس: هو أن يتكلم بلسانه وقلبه مطمئن بالإيمان

ibn abbas says that he should say with the tongue, but his heart is satisfied with eman.

and hassan basri gave us the time period till which it is allowed
he said

وقال الحسن: التقية جائزة للإنسان إلى يوم القيامة

it is allowed till qayamat.

therefore, it is proven from quran, and its sunni tafsir that a momin should not be friend of a momin except that he has to guard himself, and for that he has to do taqayya. and taqayya is till the day of qayamat.

this is link to a very good article on the topic of taqayya. they have covered more verses and narrations on this topic. please read


interestingly, nasibis charge us that it was shia who martyred holy imam;
but when we actually analyze,
we see that it is these nasibis who speak high of those who martyred the holy imam. and not just this, they even take ahadeeth from them

one of the persons who martyred ahlubait asws, martyred two little children of hazrat ubaidullah bin abbas,

by the name of

بسر بن أرطاة

we find that regarding him, ibn hajar says in his book
الإصابة‏ في تمييز الصحابة

he wrote

فقال أهل الشام سمع من النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم وهو صغير وفي سنن أبي داود بإسناد مصري قوي عن جنادة بن أبي أمية قال كنا مع بسر بن أبي أرطاة في البحر فأتى بسارق فقال سمعت رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم

people of syria aid that he heard holy prophet when he was a child, and in sunnan abi daood with isnad of misri from junada bin abi umayya, he said i was basr and he said i heard holy prophet……………

in the same way, we find

وروى بن حبان في صحيحه من طريق أيوب بن ميسرة بن حليس سمعت بسر بن أبي أرطاة يقول سمعت رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم

so we see that abi daood, and even ibn haban quoted ahadeeth from him.

and that is not all, who was he, we further find

كان من شيعة معاوية

so in deed, he was from mauwia party,

and still, sunnis charge shias of the heinous crime which their
رضي الله تعالى عنه

yes, when i say their رضي الله تعالى عنه did, we do find in masnad imam ahmad bin hanbal that he wrote

this is the online link to masnad imam hanbal, and his wordings for the cursed basr are
حديث بسر بن أرطأة رضي الله تعالى عنه

now, is this not hypocricy that sunnis call the murderers of holy imam as radiullah, yet they charge us of doing so?
is this not hypocricy that they take ahadeeth from him, yet charge us of being a party of them?
is this not hypocricy that they accept that he was in mawia’s party, yet they charge us of doing so?

may the eternal curse of allah be on zalimeen. amin

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 145 other followers

Blog Stats

  • 313,585 hits